Advertisement
Not being a "real man" myself and having been assaulted many times by males (including my father) who considered themselves to be "real men" expressing their "manhood" and who wrongly considered me to be a "faggot" (or at least vulnerable), I can't find anything good or positive in the idea of a "real man" or "manhood." It seems to consists solely of (some type of) violence; It seems to be nothing more than the belief that might IS right, violence and hierarchy deified, hatred of thought/critical thinking, worship of death, extreme emotionality. The more violent a male is, the more of a "real man" he is considered to be. No matter how far along the violence spectrum (from nonviolence to inflicting gruesome torture) a male is, he does not cease to be a "man." In the view of a "real man," inflicting pain on others needs no justification; "manhood" itself is enough. Sayings like "it takes a man to be a dad" bother me. What does this mean? Does it mean that at least one parent must be devoted to "kicking ass and taking names"? If so, then it is no more than institutionalized bullying and tyranny; better that a child have no "dad." Does it refer to the idea that children are inherently evil and must be bullied into being good? Is it just that we define the male parent as the "dad"? "Being a man" confers "legitimacy" (even among many, perhaps most, women) on a male. A "real man" must constantly monitor his feelings and behavior to make sure that he is not doing or feeling anything "feminine." So he becomes a monster-bully constantly seeking victims. Only by victimizing someone can he prove his "manhood." "Real men" are fixated on (dishonestly) dividing the world up into neat little categories (usually two): e.g. one is either a "real man" or a "bitch/woman/faggot/coward." This is the ultimate "real man" consideration. This kind of thinking is completely antidemocratic & fascist. When the majority of the people are seen by some (especially males in power) as "not legitimate," how long can democracy last? Nazi Germany was a "real-man" state. I believe that "real-man" thinking should stop. No woman is expected/required to be a "real woman" and assaulted & stigmatized when she is not. Or am I wrong about this? I believe that we should have a matriarchy or strict sexual equality and that males should embrace femininity; when males can be feminine and still be considered "legitimate," then the world will be a better place for everyone (male & female).
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: what is a "real man" or "manhood"?
Mon, August 21, 2006 - 6:06 AMI think real men are just real people who happen to be male.
People who project their fears on other people instead of facing it themcellves aren't real people, whatever genatalia they happen to be wearing.
-
Re: what is a "real man" or "manhood"?
Mon, August 21, 2006 - 11:49 AMare you familiar with john stoltenberg's work? "refusing to be a man" and "ending manhood." he was andrea dworkin's partner and an outspoken anti-porn feminist who used similar language as you have.
but i'd like to suggest some care here, especially around the term "manhood." true enough, "real man" is almost always used to bully men into becoming tougher, and rarely a kind term. but "manhood"? feminism that is anti-sex or anti-male at its root is not the most forward thinking feminism, though i certainly respect the backgrounds from which these feelings come.
recognizing differences -- not only between women and men, but among them as well -- is an important step in true liberation. men do have some tendencies which differ from women, generally speaking, and no amount of social constructionism is going to make that all go away. and THAT'S OKAY. because difference does not have to mean someone is better or someone is being mistreated. i now lobby for respecting MORE differences among individuals than trying to erase them -- we need to accept the variety of sexual and gendered configurations that the smorgasbord of humanity has to offer.
as important and vital and beautiful as it is for us and other men to honor and explore our femininity, it is also vital to be open and honor masculine tendencies as well. we are morally responsible for our actions and how we treat people, and difference is okay. if feminist men cannot be self-loving as well as recognize their part in the systematic mistreatment of women and others, then they will not be part of the solution either.
-
Unsu...
Re: what is a "real man" or "manhood"?
Mon, August 21, 2006 - 8:05 PMI have to agree with the incredibly well-spoken Jeff here. There are positive and negative aspects to both sexes, and we have to exhalt the good things inherent to both men and women. And I agree- we need to nurture an environment that embraces sexual equality, not only for men who embrace their femininity, but women who embrace their masculinity. -
-
Re: what is a "real man" or "manhood"?
Mon, August 21, 2006 - 8:46 PMThat, Caleb, is one of the most sensible things I've read in a while.
Well put.
-
Re: what is a "real man" or "manhood"?
Mon, August 21, 2006 - 10:58 PMfor too long have i ascribed to a feminism that wants to discount difference, to make us all into the same androgynous souls, and this ended up hurting me, because i knew that some things i felt and desired were not androgynous. it also healed me because i was too identified at first with energies said to characterize men. but now that i am at peace with my femininity, i find that i have powerful manly feelings as well, instincts that are simply not bad, if expressed responsibly. and i don't think they come as readily to all women either. there is meaning to our varying endocrinologies and reproductive roles, and though these seriously vary among individuals, there is still a gradient distribution along different characteristics. -
-
Unsu...
Re: what is a "real man" or "manhood"?
Mon, August 21, 2006 - 11:26 PMWell stated, Jeff. Androgyny is wonderful and can be deeply empowering, but gender clarity (for lack of a better term (please understand that I'm not trying to imply that androgyny is synonymous with confusion or indecisiveness)) has its place too. Because if it didn't, well, quite frankly, I'd be straight. :p
-
-
-
Re: what is a "real man" or "manhood"?
Sat, August 26, 2006 - 4:16 PMRE: Real Men.
As a real man, and a fag. Since I was born with a penis. I have growen to be a real man, eventhough I am also a fag. But I was not born a fag! But I was a man..........
As a survivor of torture. Where I had my childhood murded, and my soul raped, at the hands of 3 gen. of women. A famlily I was only born into, coz in 1959 my daddy to be, was forced at gunpoint to marry some town bike, whom was 7 months up the duff, and no ring on her finger.
So I was to get this town bike (Pat) for a mum, her bastard daughter for a sis, aswell Pats mum granny green for a granny. All of these women raped my soul, and deprived me of a childhood. Therefor killing it. My childhood was spent in a concentration camp, and these 3 women, my jailers.
If it was not for all this torture, where I could be dragged off at any moment of the day and night, to be tortured; oh and the mental mindfucking, that has never stoped to this day.
So when at the age of 5. I was tort the language of fellatio, and thus, looking upon this as tender touch. I was born with a dick. So therefor a male. I was not born a fag. But I have lived my whole life as one, just as I have lived my whole life as a male, a man.......
To be a Fag one must:
be born with a dick,
be a regular guy,
to be a man's man, or a man,
One can not be:
Bi,
a breeder, this comes under bi
a girly man; no queen's.
I am a fag........
But I am not gay! As anything can stand under that banner. But not anyone can stand under the banner of FAG.
Since I have never breed. I have not created misery, therefore no shame.
You Talk about Violent men. Gee's. What about feminazies. Truly women full of hat. Expecially for anything, with a dick!!!!!!
Why is it so thatthese women, whom have noting but hate for men, yet they exude all they hate about men. Agressive, dominant, controlling, bigots. My god, and they let these women breed, and be teachers.
So as a person not born a fag, and growing up in a world were women were the Nazies, now I have growen up. I live without any family, and the community I am meant to belong to, if I want a family; the gay community. Where women here too are the Nazies; feminazies.
So mate please don't put all the wrong in the world on men. As women have none just as much, to help make things worse too.
I am proude to be a real man, a regualr guy, whom like to suck cock. I thank god I never chose to me a girly man; just as the feminazies have done a lot of damage, coz they stick out so much, so do and have the girly men, and I want to be a real man leather queen's; yuk. -
-
Re: what is a "real man" or "manhood"?
Sat, August 26, 2006 - 10:57 PMyour personal story is full of pain and i sincerely feel for you for sure. sounds like an incredibly difficult start in life, to say the least. you've really run into some seriously wounded people who spread their malice. i'm sorry these things have happened to you.
"So mate please don't put all the wrong in the world on men. As women have none just as much, to help make things worse too."
without disregarding your personal experience at all in any way, i have to say the evidence is against this generalization.
-- around 90% of people in jail in the us are male
-- 65% of murders in the US are committed by men with male victims
-- 23% of murders in the US are committed by men with female victims
-- 10% of murders in the US are committed by women with male victims
-- 2% of murders in the US are committed by women with female victims
www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homic...gender.htm
-- most hate crimes are perpretrated by men
-- most war involves men
-- men forcibly rape and batter women with exponential more frequency than they do each other or women do to men
-- men commit much more aggravated assault, burglary, armed robbery, reckless endangerment, drunk driving
i'm too lazy to find stats on these matters, but i doubt i need to, as most people take these facts as immediately obvious!
now, that doesn't mean men are bad people, or that we're all anything for that matter. and it certainly doesn't take back any comments we've made about men hating themselves -- that's not the way out. self-acceptance is the start of any healing journey. honesty to oneself is also the only way one can change. feminism is good for men. it's about being real and free outside of rigid gender programs, and it's about channeling negative energy responsibly -- both women and men. the more we integrate our understanding with other oppressions -- race, culture, class, species, ability, age -- we see that everyone is on the other side somehow. we are all in the same boat. we just need to get the ones are trying to sink it to chill the fuck out!
-